TV Show Review: Doctor Who Episode 2.00 “The Christmas Invasion”

Since the full review of Series 2 is taking a long time, I am posting early the review for the special Christmas episode, which technically is a “bridge” between Series 1 and 2 and thus doesn’t get officially counted as the second season’s first episode, even though it follows directly from the Series 1 finale and plays first on the Series 2 DVDs. Despite being denied an official number, it’s still an important episode. If you go straight from Episode 1.13 “The Parting of the Ways” to Episode 2.01 “New Earth,” you’ll be missing some awfully important stuff.

Series: Doctor Who
Season.Episode: 2.00 “The Christmas Invasion” (special episode bridging Series 1 and 2)
Original Air Date: Christmas Day 2005
Length: 45 minutes each
Writer: Russell T. Davies
Lead Actors: David Tennant (The Tenth Doctor), Billie Piper (Rose Tyler), Noel Clarke (Mickey), Camille Coduri (Jackie Tyler)
Synopsis: “A newly-regenerated Doctor must battle the Sycorax. But he can’t do that when he’s lying unconscious in Rose’s house…” (from Wikipedia)
Reason for Watching: I think I’m now addicted to Doctor Who.
Episode Re-watchability: Not as much as the best DW episodes, but as with all of them, I could watch it again and be entertained.
Final Verdict: A fine transition into a new season and a New Doctor. This episode is a good example of one of the show’s key strengths and one of its weaknesses. The strength is how in tune it is with the reactions of its audience, such that it can guide the transition from one intensely charismatic Doctor to another quite gracefully. The weakness is its often-heavy-handed and hypocritical pacifism. However, I’ve come to accept that weakness as simply coming with the territory, at least while Davies is Head Writer.

Key Thoughts

He can sleep through an awful lot.

There was no guarantee Tennant would be popular, so the decision to keep him incapacitated for most of the episode (from his regeneration) was actually a shrewd one: aliens are invading and we feel liking yelling “Wake up, Doctor, WAKE UP!” We want him, we’re desperate for him to show up. And not just the audience, but the characters also. Rose sobs as she realizes that the Ninth Doctor is really, truly gone, and cannot come back. She’s not sure if she likes the Tenth Doctor, simply because he’s different and he replaced the Ninth. Both Jackie Tyler and Mickey are also a bit confused about the Tenth, unsure of how to treat him. Thus the supporting cast and the audience empathize with each other on the subject of Eccleston’s leaving.

Heroic Mickey. He's trying, at least.

The plot involves a typical, straightforward alien invasion that’s not too interesting by itself, but does allow for some memorably goofy bits. Evil street Santas, killer robotic Christmas trees, the Doctor getting saved by a cup of tea and challenging an alien overlord to a sword duel while in his pajamas…you know, typical Doctor Who! The feel is very reminiscent of Series 1’s pilot “Rose,” with the killer mannequin zombies, where the plot is just an excuse to introduce the new characters. We also get to see our old friend Harriet Jones, former M.P. of Flydale North, now Prime Minister because of the level-headed way she navigated the British government through crisis in Episodes 1.4-5 “Aliens of London” and “World War Three.” And oh yes, that mysterious name Torchwood is becoming more dangerous.


Here is where that hypocritical pacifism comes in that I don’t buy or like. The Doctor beats the Sycorax leader in single combat and, per their agreement, forces the Sycorax to retreat from Earth peacefully. But as the Sycorax spaceship begins to fly out of Earth’s atmosphere, PM Harriet Jones makes a call to Torchwood, and a green Death Star-like laser shoots out from the city of London and destroys it. Furious, the Doctor claims that she is the real monster because she breached a peace agreement and committed murder; furthermore, he brings down her government by planting suspicions in the British public that she is “tired,” despite the fact she is still implied to be highly capable and intelligent.

I don’t think the Doctor is right to do this at all, but the show seems to agree with him. The peace agreement was between the Doctor and the Sycorax, and he did not consult Jones or any other Earth leaders for it, meaning it had no authority. The Doctor was presumptuous and arrogant in doing that. Plus, the Sycorax were warlike and bent on the destruction of humanity – how is Jones to know that they have a sense of honor or keep their word? So many aliens we’ve met in the series haven’t. It wasn’t the most chivalrous thing for Jones to do, but I don’t think it was wrong. It was shrewd, and the Doctor was out of line to deny Britain the right to protect itself.

Don't try to stick your tongue out to catch the holiday's first snowflakes -- they're really pieces of burnt aliens.

The reason this bugs me more than usual (such as similar pacifism in Episode 1.06 “Dalek”) is because it makes the end of this Christmas episode very bitter. Sure, it’s touching that the Doctor finally allows himself to share Christmas dinner with Rose and her family, but when it’s revealed that what they think is the season’s first snow is really burnt ash from the Sycorax ship falling back to Earth, what are we to feel? In the DVD commentary, Russell T. Davies says he wanted to avoid an ending that’s “too happy.” Well, he miscalculated for this one – Christmas shows are supposed to be “too happy.” That’s one of the reasons we have them in the first place!

But to end on a better note, we do get to see the Tenth Doctor put together his iconic and incredibly sharp costume at the end.

No no, not with the Christmas hat and the awkward caught-me-halfway-through-smiling! This one:

Good. If you’re going to travel through space and time, might as well dress right for it.

The Doctor: Am I… ginger?
Rose: No, you’re just sort of… brown.
The Doctor: [disappointed] Aw, I wanted to be ginger! I’ve never been ginger! And you, Rose Tyler! Fat lot of good you were! You gave up on me! [Rose looks annoyed] Ooh, that’s rude. Is that the sort of man I am now? Am I rude? Rude and not ginger.


Author: David

I’m a young Christian American reader writer dreamer wanderer walker flier listener talker scholar adventurer musician word-magician romantic critic religious idealist optipessimist man.

6 thoughts on “TV Show Review: Doctor Who Episode 2.00 “The Christmas Invasion””

  1. Dr Who fans are sometimes known as “Whovians” (kinda parallel to calling Star Trek fans “Trekkies”) so I guess you are one of “us” now? Good to see another addict come onto the scene. Now I’ll have to track down the new series on YouTube or Hulu or wherever it can be found. I don’t think I saw much of the 2nd season as the 10th Dr doesn’t look that familiar to me. I’ll definitely have to catch up with it all now, some day RSN (Real Soon Now).

  2. I agree with you on the pacifism thing, though I try to look at it as a character flaw in the Doctor, instead of the writer’s agenda (which, yeah, it is). He himself killed many in the Time War and now it’s messed him up to the point where he thinks all killing is wrong. He’ll lapse a bit in future episodes, and the question is argued from both sides – not just his.

    I think my favorite thing about this episode was the Hitchhiker’s reference – after saving the Earth in his pajamas, “Very Arthur Dent.” I freaked out when he said that.

    1. Yeah, the pop culture references are always fun. Like the Ninth’s third episode, where he geeks out over Charles Dickens, or “The Shakespeare Code” episode of Series 3, where the Tenth geeks out over Shakespeare AND Harry Potter — that was hilarious. And the pajama Arthur Dent quote was fun too — now I’m just waiting for a towel to play a pivotal role in an adventure!

      True, they do allow criticism of the Doctor himself, and that’s nice. It means that even when we think the show writer agrees with the wrong thing, they still are encouraging us to think critically about it all. I like that aspect of the show.

  3. I’m afraid I think you’re wrong about the Sycorax and Harriet Jones. True, she doesn’t know if they will keep their word, or have a sense of honour – but she doesn’t know that they won’t, either. They may be the sort of aliens who never break a promise. She doesn’t know, and she blows them up anyway. The Doctor presumably does know – and he was trusting them to keep their word.
    I see from your profile that you describe yourself as young and American, which means that you would most likely miss the reference in this incident that any British person of a certain age would see instantly. This is the sinking of the Belgrano in the Falklands War by Margaret Thatcher, which caused quite a scandal at the time.
    By the way, I thought your review of Eagle of the Ninth was wonderful. I agree with every word (time I re-read it again, I think).

    1. You have a good point there, what with the Doctor’s knowledge and choosing to trust the Sycorax’s word. However, I would still question his right to usurp the role of spokesperson for Earth and dictate how humans can and cannot defend themselves against unknown, hostile forces. And it’s quite easy for we viewers to trust the Doctor, since we’ve seen him on his previous adventures and, hey, he’s the hero! But Harriet Jones only observed him once previously, and neither she nor any of her government know the Doctor’s nature well enough to really trust him like that. She also knows that he’s not always around to save them, and that humanity must work hard to defend itself against myriad extraterrestrial threats.

      I suppose that ends up as an argument for the legitimacy of Torchwood (however horribly managed they seem to be in the finale!) more than one for Jones’ specific action here, though. It definitely wasn’t honorable, I’ll give you that. You could also argue that the Sycorax had been enemies of the whole world, not just Britain, and that Harriet Jones herself was illegitimately usurping the role of spokesperson/leader for all the world’s countries. If there had been another Sycorax fleet nearby that had turned around and attacked Earth because of the breach of truce, the other nations could quite rightfully blame Jones for ruining the chances of peace and dooming them all.

      Yup, I missed that reference! Being unaware of that incident, and honestly having only vague impressions of Thatcher by reputation, I can’t critique or analyze the episode from that angle. *shrug*

      Thanks for the intelligent comment, I appreciate it! And I’m also glad you enjoyed my Eagle of the Ninth review. I’ll certainly talk about Sutcliff more in the future. My next review to come, though, is Doctor Who Series 2!

What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s